The Influence of the Problem Based Learning Model And Students' Learning Motivation Towards Physics Learning Outcomes Students of SMAN 5 Takalar
Keywords:
Problem Based Learning, Motivation Study , Results StudAbstract
This study investigates the influence of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model and students' learning motivation on physics learning outcomes among Grade XII science students at SMAN 5 Takalar. Motivated by low achievement rates under conventional instruction—where only 54.9% of students reached the minimum competency standard—this experimental research involved 70 students divided into two homogenous groups: an experimental class applying PBL and a control class using direct instruction. Data were collected through tests and questionnaires, then analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-way ANOVA, and t-tests. The results showed that students taught with PBL outperformed those in conventional settings, with an average score of 42.06 compared to 31.74. PBL was also effective across both high and low learning motivation levels. However, no significant interaction was found between the learning model and motivation. These findings suggest that PBL can be a consistently effective instructional approach to enhance learning outcomes in physics education, regardless of students’ motivation levels.
Downloads
References
Z. Abidin, H. Karyono, and E. M. Rahayu, “The Influence of Project Based Learning Model and Learning Motivation on Learning Outcomes in Productive Subjects in Vocational High Schools,” JIPI (Scientific Journal of Informatics Research and Learning), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v6i1.1619
A. Andriani, “Pendulum the Earthquake Alarm STEM Implementation Product in Inquiry-Based Physics Learning in Class XI MIA 4 at SMAN 4 Kejuruan Muda in the 2019/2020 Academic Year,” GRAVITY: Journal of Physics and Science Education, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 6–11, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33059/gravitasi.jpfs.v3i01.2312
S. Arikunto, Classroom Action Research: Revised Edition. Jakarta: Earth of Letters, 2021.
Dermawan, Application of Learning Models Problem Based Learning to Improve the Learning Outcomes of Geography for Class XI PIS 3 Students at SMAN 5 Takalar, Thesis, 2023.
R. Febriana, Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Earth of Letters, 2021.
A. E. Gates, “Benefits of a STEM collaboration in Newark, New Jersey: Volcano simulation through a glass-making experience,” J. Geosci. Educ., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2017.
M. S. Hanafy, “The Concept of Learning and Learning,” J. Educ. Teach. Sci., vol. 17, pp. 66–79, 2014.
F. Hapsari, L. Desnaranti, and S. Wahyuni, “The Role of Teachers in Motivating Students' Learning during Distance Learning Activities,” Res. Dev. J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 193–204, 2021.
M. Hendri, N. Nehru, D. P. Rasmi, and J. V. Sirait, “Training on the Application of the STEM-2C Model in Physics Learning for Teachers of SMAN 8 Tanjab Timur,” Estungkara: J. Hist. Educ. Serv., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 59–69, 2023.
A. Idzhar, “The Role of Teachers in Increasing Students' Learning Motivation,” Office J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 2016.
Ministry of Education and Culture, “Four Main Policy Points of Independent Learning,” Ditsmp.Kemdikbud.go.id, 2019.
Ministry of Education and Culture, “6 Characteristics of Intelligent and Characterful Pancasila Students,” Ditsmp.Kemdikbud.go.id, 2021.
S. Lestari, “Development of 21st Century Skills Orientation in Physics Learning through PJBL-STEM Learning Assisted by Spectra-Plus,” Ideguru: J. Teachers’ Sci. Work, vol. 6, no. 3, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v6i3.243
H. Masni, “Strategies to Increase Students' Learning Motivation,” Dikdaya Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2017.
M. P. E. Morales et al., “Teacher professional development program (TPDP) for teacher quality in STEM education,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 188, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1439
M. Muhammad, “The Influence of Motivation in Learning,” Lantanida J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2017.
S. Mulyadi, A. M. H. Basuki, and W. Rahardjo, Educational Psychology with the Approach of New Theories in Psychology. 2017.
A. Nasution, “Thematic Learning Based on Learning Media in Improving Student Quality,” Al-Khair J.: Manage., Educ. Law, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 130–144, 2023.
V. R. Panginan and Susianti, “The Effect of Implementing the Independent Learning Curriculum on Mathematics Learning Outcomes Reviewed from a Comparison of the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum,” J. Elem. School Teacher Educ., Lamappapoleonro Univ., vol. 1, pp. 9–16, 2022.
I. P. A. A. Payadnya and I. G. A. N. T. Jayantika, Experimental Research Guide and Statistical Analysis with SPSS. Deepublish, 2018.
M. N. Purwanto, Educational Psychology. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2021.
L. Puspitasari, S. Subiki, and B. Supriadi, “The Effect of Phet Simulation Media on Motivation and Physics Learning Outcomes of Vocational High School Students,” J. Phys. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2022.
M. Rangga and P. Naomi, “The Influence of Self-Motivation on Student Learning Performance (Case Study on Students of Paramadina University),” Paramadina Psychol. J., vol. II, pp. 1–8, 2017.
R. Rosdiana, M. Marnita, and N. Safarati, “STEM Learning Model to Improve High-Order Thinking Skills of Class X Students of SMA Negeri 2 Peusangan,” JEMAS: J. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 47–52, 2022.
S. P. Suharti, M. K. Sumardi, M. Hanafi, and L. Hakim, Teaching Learning Strategies. Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.
N. Sudjana, How Active Students Learn in the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Algensindo New Light, 1999.
M. D. Sundawan, “Differences between the Constructivism Learning Model and the Direct Learning Model,” J. Logika, vol. XVI, no. 1, p. 111, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/logika/article/viewFile/14/13
UPI Sumedang Press, Test and Measurement. 2018.
M. M. Trianggono, “Causality Analysis of Concept Understanding with Students' Creative Thinking Ability in Physics Problem Solving,” J. Phys. Educ. Sci. (JPFK), vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v3i1.874
H. B. One, Motivation Theory and Its Measurement: Analysis in the Field of Education. Jakarta: Earth of Letters, 2023.
U. Usmadi, “Analysis Requirements Testing (Homogeneity Test and Normality Test),” Educ. Innov., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020.
W. C. Wati, “Analysis of Evaluation Result Standards through the Learning Process,” SOKO GURU: J. Educ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2022.
A. M. Yusuf, Quantitative, Qualitative & Combined Research Methods. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016.
